Friday, June 23, 2006

Fidelity Rollover IRA part 3

Well, I've finally completed the rollover of my previous 403b retirement account with Fidelity. I had previously posted on this process which began about 1 mos ago. Overall, a pretty smooth process, most of the delay occurred from me getting the necessary signatures from my previous employer. Again, while I prefer Vanguard over Fidelity, I have decided to keep my retirement funds with Fidelity since my current employer retirement plan is also with them.

A few comments about the whole process:

-Fidelity had great service.... very accessible, polite people that actually were helpful.

-As part of the rollover process, they are supposed to provide some guidance with investing options... I found this not as useful. I think it depends on your level of knowledge with mutual funds. For a beginner, it is great...I consider myself intermediate so not that useful. It seems that they mostly promote their Freedom Funds (i.e. fund of funds) which seems reasonable especially since my overall balance is not so large.... however, don't expect much in terms of guidance for individual funds to makeup an overall appropriate asset allocation.


-Entire process is done electronically. Recommend this so as to avoid any possible complications with taxes as you have 60 days from withdrawal of funds from a 403b to rollover your funds into an IRA before paying penalties to the IRS.

-Of note, while all the Fidelity mutual funds I owned rolled-over without hiccups, I had a PIMCO bond fund that did NOT rollover and went into a money market fund. I could repurchase this with my rollover; however, the minimum purchase is $2500 which is more than I wanted to allocate to a bond fund at this time. Given the current environment of rising interest rates, I think it's OK to leave my money in a money market fund for now (yield was 4.75%).....but kinda sucks to not have the same access to my previous Pimco fund.
Subscribe to Not Keeping Up With the Jonezez's Feed

Sunday, June 18, 2006

Active Management and Fantasy Baseball

I'm very much a fan of indexing and try to read as much as possible by people like John Bogle (Vanguard) and Jonathan Clements (WSJ) who are strong advocates of indexing and passive investing. One of the benefits of passive investing is decreasing transaction costs and minimizing taxes which necessarily should result in higher returns...

How does this relate to fantasy baseball?

At work, I joined a group of co-workers for a friendly game of fantasy baseball this season as provided by Yahoo. Just like stocks, we can add new players to our teams or drop players from our team if you don't think they are putting up the numbers (i.e. performing well in your "portfolio"). Of the people in the league, one guy is actually serving in Iraq so I presume has limited access to information (looking at box-scores, stats, etc) and limited access to the internet. He is the quintessential passive player b/c he hardly makes any moves/transactions in changing his lineup.

The rest of us... depending on how serious the competitor is, spend quite a bit of time "researching" players and re-evaluating our lineups. As part of the game, the league keeps track of how many "transactions" or moves each has made. Unlike my approach to investing, for some reason, I execute a number of transactions for fantasy baseball (29 moves so far this season). I was in first place for the first 6 weeks of the season and of course, trash-talking; however, lately, I have lost the lead to the current first place leader..... notably, the guy serving in Iraq.

He has a total of 8 transactions all season. So while I'm constantly tinkering with my lineup and trying to find "hot" players, the guy that is not adjusting his lineup frequently has eventually overcome all other players and is now in first place.

I finally realized that similar to many investors, I have been chasing performance in my fantasy league team and this eventually caught up to me in costing me the lead. And across all yahoo sports fantasy players, people often do the same thing... namely, chase performance. I noticed this b/c yahoo provides statistics of the most added or dropped player over the previous week and players that are added are often those that have recently caught fire and are putting up big offensive numbers. Similarly, investors have poured billions of dollars into emerging markets and international funds in 2005/6 even though the bulk of gains in these sectors were made in years prior.

So who will be the next hot hitter for the month of July in Major League Baseball? Might as well throw darts as nobody can truly predict this... not even Peter Gammons, Stuart Scott, or Joe Torre.
Subscribe to Not Keeping Up With the Jonezez's Feed
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License.